Grammar Dispute in the Minions and its Impact on Jurisprudential Provisions
Motlaq Elmershad, Alfarwanyia, Kuwait.
Abstract
The study in its entirety on the close relationship between grammar, jurisprudence, and statement that different linguists themselves in the grammatical guidelines and interpretations and the varying views, it reflected the views and interpretive jurisprudence derived from the Holy Quran, and the Sunnah, Then the commentators and scholars of assets did not violate those rules established by grammarians, but they returned to it they have adopted in their opinions.
And I devoted my studies in the dispute in grammar disciples and its impact on jurisprudential provisions, introduced the views of grammarians and fundamentalists in the disciple’s statement grammatical difference of opinion, what led to different scholars, and choose the references of them, As the issue of the establishment of defamation whether the projectile man or woman, Different grammarians in the field of addition in the meanings of Waw letter and Fa letter then waw letter ,but and Rather, And the impact of this difference in the multiplicity of doctrinal views per issue, And it showed the separation between the addition and the additioned to and the impact on the views of scholars in some matters, The research is also the issue of multiple qualities and the kindness of some of them, and the impact of differences in jurists, And he stopped at the emphasis allowance and grammatical differences of opinion in some issues are, And the impact on different scholars in their fatwas.
The study found a number of conclusions that have been drawn, For example, differences of views grammatical and weighting them the reason for differences in the Prime jurists, Multiple views in a single issue, and the jurisprudence of scientists influenced by sectarian affiliations, Becomes grammar and semantic routing Introduction to consolidate the view that settled in their minds beforehand, Also like them sometimes to tip the face of faces syntactical be based on what is likely in the doctrine of jurisprudence.